Eating out: Full Bench find UberEats delivery driver not an employee

“Uber claimed that it did not exercise control over the delivery driver as she was free to perform deliveries whenever she wanted or indeed not at all. Further, Uber argued that its guidelines were a form of quality control for its customers and should not be viewed as exercising control over its “partners.”

Rate of pay, however, is determined by Uber. A business model where a rate of pay is fixed by an agreement is, by definition, price-fixing.

Both entities in this case must be charged with a conspiracy to restrain free trade: Amita Gupta and Uber

#antitrust #pricefixing #gigeconomy #canofworms #ridehailing #marketplaces #gigworkers #collusion #ecommerce #competitionlaw Fair Work Commission ACCC Sarah Court

Author: Litesand

Antitrust, real estate, e-commerce, fintech, proptech, bigtech

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: